Religious Scholars and Modern Technology:
A Tale of Resistance and Adaptation
Throughout
history, religious scholars in many Muslim societies have exhibited resistance
to technological advancements. This pattern of initial rejection followed by
eventual adoption has left lasting impacts on the cultural, technological, and
economic development of these societies. The historical reluctance to embrace
innovation reveals both the challenges of reconciling tradition with progress
and the consequences of delayed adaptation.
The Clock That Marked Progress but Was Smashed as Heresy
When the
mechanical clock first arrived in Ottoman Turkey in late 1570, it was dismissed
as a heretical invention. A crown prince even went so far as to publicly smash
it in a square, branding it a symbol of unwelcome innovation. However, the
first clock tower in Turkey was erected in 1797 in Safranbolu.
Yet today,
watches and clocks are ubiquitous, including among religious scholars who once
deemed them unacceptable.
The Camera and the “Sin” of Images
The
invention of the camera and the subsequent development 1816-1826 of photography
faced staunch opposition from clerics, who labeled it un-Islamic, later in
1924, when the Turkish Republic officially adopted secularism, images accepted.
In parts of
the Indian subcontinent, taking photographs was considered sinful well into the
20th century.
However,
fast forward to the present, and the same religious leaders who opposed
photography now frequently appear on camera, their sermons and discussions
broadcasted across television and digital platforms.
The Case of Coffee: A “Forbidden” Brew
Even
something as mundane as coffee did not escape controversy. When coffee arrived
in the Ottoman Empire around 1620, riots broke out, fueled by the misconception
that it was a product of Western infidels. Ironically, coffee’s origins trace
back to Muslim regions in Africa, underscoring the resistance rooted in
ignorance rather than substance.
Technological Resistance: The Printing Press and Beyond
Perhaps one
of the most detrimental examples of technological rejection was the printing
press. For over 500 years, Muslim societies barred its use, fearing it would
erode the art of calligraphy and disrupt the livelihoods of scribes. The Mughal
Emperor Akbar reportedly dismissed the printing press, arguing it would lead to
unemployment among scribes. Such short-sighted decisions left Muslim societies
lagging behind in education and innovation for centuries.
In contrast,
European societies embraced the printing press, sparking a revolution in
knowledge dissemination and literacy.
Loudspeakers and the Evolution of Religious Practice
The arrival
of loudspeakers in South Asia was similarly contentious. Initially deemed haram
(forbidden) by prominent scholars like Maulana Ashraf Thanvi, loudspeakers were
eventually embraced and are now indispensable in mosques. Today, however, their
misuse—such as overlapping broadcasts from multiple mosques—raises questions
about thoughtful integration rather than outright rejection.
Lessons from the East: Adopting Technology Without Losing Identity
While religious scholars in Muslim societies resisted technological advancements, countries like Japan and China took a different approach. They embraced modern innovations while safeguarding their cultural and religious traditions. By doing so, they positioned themselves as exporters of technology, leading global industries in manufacturing, robotics, and artificial intelligence.
This
adaptability contrasts sharply with the stagnation observed in many
Muslim-majority countries, where fear of cultural erosion or perceived
religious incompatibility often delayed progress. As a result, these nations
became dependent on technological imports, limiting their ability to compete
globally.
The Cost of Resistance
The
opposition of religious scholars to technology often stems from a fear of
change disrupting societal norms. However, the repercussions of such resistance
are borne by society at large. When societies fail to adopt and integrate new
technologies promptly, they risk falling behind, not just technologically but
economically and politically.
Religious
scholars eventually adopt the very technologies they once opposed, evident in
the widespread use of platforms like YouTube by many prominent clerics. Yet,
the initial resistance often results in lost opportunities for advancement and
growth.
A Path Forward: Bridging Tradition and Modernity
The
resistance to technology in Muslim societies highlights a broader challenge:
finding a balance between preserving religious and cultural identity while
embracing progress. Religious scholars hold significant influence and could
play a constructive role by guiding their communities toward thoughtful
adoption of innovations.
Rather than
viewing technology as a threat, it can be framed as a tool for amplifying
positive values, improving education, and fostering economic development.
Learning from other societies that have successfully navigated this balance can
offer valuable lessons for the future.
The history
of technological resistance in Muslim societies serves as a cautionary tale of
missed opportunities and delayed progress. To thrive in an increasingly
interconnected and competitive world, these societies must move beyond the
reflexive rejection of change and instead embrace innovation as a means of
empowerment. Only then can they shed the legacy of technological dependency and
reclaim a place of leadership in global progress.
References: