The Birth of Zero

The Clash of Faith and Reason in 9th-Century Baghdad

In the intellectual ferment of Abbasid Baghdad, debates raged over religion, philosophy, and governance. When Imam Abu Hanifa’s rationalist jurisprudence gained official status, Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal challenged the caliph’s authority to impose religious doctrine, advocating instead for collective consensus (ijma). Meanwhile, the Mu'tazilites—influenced by Greek philosophy—promoted reason as a path to divine truth, enjoying the patronage of the caliph himself.

Al-Ma’mun: The Philosopher-Caliph

Al-Ma’mun, son of Harun al-Rashid, was an unlikely ruler. After seizing power following his brother Amin’s assassination—despite never being named heir—he distinguished himself from previous caliphs by his insatiable thirst for knowledge. A Hafiz of the Quran and a scholar of theology, he invested vast resources in translating Greek, Persian, and Indian texts into Arabic.

Under his rule, Baghdad became a crucible of ideas where theologians (mutakallimun), philosophers (falasifa), and mystics (sufis) debated free will, predestination, and the nature of God.

The Dream That Changed History

Legend says al-Ma’mun once dreamed of Aristotle, who counseled him:

"Balance reason (ta‘aqqul) and certainty (tayaqqun). Cherish new ideas, no matter their origin—for knowledge has no religion, no nation. To suppress thought is to defy the divine."

Inspired, al-Ma’mun established the House of Wisdom (Bayt al-Hikma), a research center where scholars of all faiths—Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians—worked side by side. Among them was a little-known mathematician from Khwarazm: Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi.

Al-Khwarizmi and the Mystery of the Black Dot

Al-Khwarizmi was obsessed with numbers. But in Baghdad, merchants still counted on their fingers or used rudimentary Hindu numerals (1-9). A greater puzzle lay in an ancient Indian manuscript—the Brahma-sphuta-siddhanta—where he discovered a curious symbol: a black dot (śūnya), representing nothingness.

At first, he dismissed it. How could "nothing" be a number?

But as he experimented, he realized this void was the key to infinite calculation. By shifting digits left or right, the dot—now named ṣifr (zero)—could transform 1 into 10, 100, 1000.

One night, atop his rooftop, the truth struck him:

"Zero is both the end and the beginning. Existence itself emerges from nothingness!"

Laughing madly under the stars, the usually reserved scholar danced in revelation.

The Cosmic Zero: From Baghdad to the Renaissance

Al-Khwarizmi’s ṣifr revolutionized mathematics:

• Algebra (al-jabr): His systematic equations birthed modern algebra.
• Algorithms: Latin translations of his work (Algoritmi de numero Indorum) gave the world the term algorithm.
• The Digital Age: Tesla’s wireless energy and binary code (1s and 0s) owe their logic to zero.

The Dark Universe: Zero’s Modern Echo

Centuries later, science uncovered another void:

• Dark Matter (24%) and Dark Energy (71%)—invisible forces binding the cosmos, much like zero binds numbers.
• Quantum Physics: The vacuum isn’t empty; it teems with potential.

Epilogue: The Legacy of Nothingness

From Hindu sages to Persian mathematicians, from medieval mystics (wahdat al-wujud) to Tesla’s visions, zero remains the silent architect of reality. It is the pause between notes in music, the silence before speech—proof that nothing holds everything together.

---

Sources & Further Reading:

• Al-Khwarizmi, The Compendious Book on Calculation by Completion and Balancing (830 CE).
• George Gheverghese Joseph, The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics.
• NASA Astrophysics: Dark Matter & Dark Energy research.
• Amir D. Aczel, Finding Zero: A Mathematician’s Odyssey to Uncover the Origins of Numbers.

Is there a creator of this universe?

The Unfathomable Nature of the Creator

This single question—Does the universe have a Creator? —unfurls into countless others.

If there is a Creator, what is its nature? Does it reside within the fabric of space and time that governs our existence, or is it entirely beyond them? How did it come into being? Is it enthroned on some distant celestial plane, or is it woven into the very essence of our reality? Does it govern every life and death, observing every motion, or did it simply set the universe in motion and then retreat into silence?

Perhaps the Creator is nothing more than pure existence itself—an essence from which all things emanate, including ourselves and the cosmos we perceive.

And then there is the radical possibility: that no such being exists at all, that the universe simply is, without cause or purpose. But this, too, only deepens the mystery. If there is no Creator, then what is this grand spectacle around us? What is its nature, and how did it come to be?

The Limits of Human Perception

Before we seek answers, we must confront a more fundamental question: What are we? In the vast expanse of the cosmos, what is our place? And how limited is our knowledge when it comes to deciphering the enigmas of space, time, and the divine?

Are our five senses—and the sum of human knowledge—even capable of discerning whether a being as incomprehensible as God exists?

Our predicament runs deeper. We cannot even say with certainty whether the world we perceive as vivid and real is anything more than an elaborate illusion. Could this existence be nothing but a dream?

The Poverty of Human Imagination

Every conception of God is bound within the confines of space and time. Our thoughts have limits; we cannot transcend them to grasp what lies beyond. Our consciousness operates in three dimensions, perceiving time as a linear flow from past to present to future. The mistake lies in assuming that God’s perception of existence mirrors our own.

In daily discourse, we attribute human qualities to the divine:

• God created us.
• God watches over us.
• God can help us.

These are human projections, not divine truths. The God we describe—endowed with human-like virtues—is a being constrained by our own mental constructs, far removed from whatever reality may lie beyond.

When we ask:

• Where does God reside?
• What does God do?
• What form does God take?

We are merely describing our own inventions, not the essence of the divine.

The Universe: A Cosmic Riddle

Modern science tells us the universe began 13.8 billion years ago in an event called the Big Bang. Before this, all of space and time were compressed into an infinitesimal point of unimaginable heat and density. The Big Bang set off an expansion—space unfurled, temperatures dropped, atoms formed, then molecules, stars, planets, and galaxies.

Scientists have confirmed that the universe is still expanding—but at a rate that defies the known laws of matter and energy. Astonishingly, we can only perceive about 5% of the cosmos. The rest remains hidden, composed of dark matter and dark energy, entities whose nature eludes us entirely. It is as if an unseen specter moves objects in a room, leaving no trace of its presence.

The Expanding Universe: Finite Yet Infinite?

The idea of an ever-expanding cosmos is both mesmerising and paradoxical. One might imagine the universe as a finite sphere with edges we could reach—but astronomy suggests a stranger truth: the universe may be both finite and boundless.

Imagine a balloon inflating. To a two-dimensional creature living on its surface, the balloon appears limited yet edge-less—it can travel endlessly without ever finding a boundary. Similarly, our three-dimensional minds struggle to conceive of a universe that is simultaneously expanding and unbounded.

To truly comprehend the cosmos, we would need to step outside it—to observe from a vantage point beyond space and time. Such a perspective is beyond human imagination. Yet if God exists, perhaps it perceives existence from a fourth dimension—one we cannot even fathom.

The Shifting Sands of Scientific Truth

The Big Bang theory is barely a century old. Before its emergence, scientists believed the universe was eternal and unchanging. Had we debated God’s nature then, our conclusions would have been entirely different.

Human arrogance lies in assuming that present knowledge is absolute truth. History shows how scientific revolutions dismantle old certainties. Who knows how future generations will regard our current understanding?

Unanswered Questions at the Edge of Reality

If we accept the Big Bang as the universe’s birth, deeper mysteries emerge:

• What existed before? Was there another cosmos that collapsed into a singularity, birthing our own?
• What is the universe’s ultimate fate? Will expansion cease, leading to a Big Crunch—a reversal into nothingness? Could another Big Bang follow?
• Quantum mechanics suggests not one, but infinite parallel universes, each untouched by the others.

This raises the most profound question of all: What is the purpose of this vast, possibly endless, cosmic expanse?

The Illusion of Human Significance

As a species, we flatter ourselves by believing the universe was made for us. Yet consider:

Our galaxy contains billions of stars, and the observable universe holds trillions of galaxies. The sun is but an ordinary speck among them. If this cosmos were designed for us, why are we so insignificant within it? Why can we not even travel to the nearest star without spending years—bound by the speed of light?

An even more unsettling possibility: What if the universe does not exist at all? What if this is all an elaborate illusion—a dream from which we may one day awaken?

The Humility of Ignorance

Our knowledge is evolving, incomplete. We stand no closer to definitive answers about God, creation, or existence itself. For all our pride as the "pinnacle of creation," our cosmic stature is no greater than that of an insect crawling on Earth.

Before we make grand claims about the Creator’s nature, we must first recognize our own limitations. Strip away the traditions and dogmas passed down through generations. Rely solely on reason and perception. Can any human honestly claim to know whether a Creator exists—let alone define its essence?

The Final Question: Will We Ever Know?

Will there come a time when science provides a definitive answer about God’s existence and nature? Or is this a mystery destined to remain beyond human grasp—eternally elusive, eternally awe-inspiring?

Perhaps the greatest wisdom lies not in claiming answers, but in embracing the questions themselves.

---

Sources & Further Reading:

• Hawking, Stephen. A Brief History of Time.
• Greene, Brian. The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos.
• NASA’s Cosmic Dark Energy and Dark Matter research.
• Quantum mechanics interpretations (Many-Worlds Theory, Copenhagen Interpretation).

Why Humans Are Less Content Than Animals?

The Paradox of Progress

Explore why human progress fuels anxiety while animals find peace in simplicity. Uncover stoic wisdom and actionable steps to reclaim contentment.

---

Imagine a lion lounging in the shade after a meal, utterly at peace. Now picture a billionaire in a penthouse, restless despite luxury. Why does one thrive in simplicity while the other drowns in discontent? This blog delves into the evolutionary quirks and psychological traps that make humans uniquely restless and how ancient philosophy might hold the key to reclaiming tranquility.

---

The Evolutionary Roots of Human Discontent
Two hundred thousand years ago, survival meant outrunning predators. Today, it’s outsmarting algorithms and societal pressures. Unlike animals, whose needs end with food and shelter, humans evolved to chase the intangible: status, power, and endless “more.” Nietzsche captured this paradox: “In times of peace, the warlike man attacks himself.” Without external threats, we turn inward, battling insecurities and invented crises.

The Agricultural and Industrial Revolutions amplified this angst. We traded primal dangers for abstract ones—loneliness, existential dread, and AI-induced obsolescence. As Tolstoy noted, “We spend our lives preparing to live, but never truly live.”

---

Why Animals Outshine Us in Contentment
Animals live by instinct, not ambition. A well-fed tiger doesn’t stress about territory expansion; a hydrated deer doesn’t hoard water. Their contentment hinges on present needs, not future gains. Humans, however, are wired to seek novelty. Give us a problem-free life, and we’ll invent problems—a self-sabotaging trait Nietzsche called “attacking oneself.”

Case in Point:

• Simplicity vs. Complexity: Animals thrive on basic needs. Humans conflate “survival” with “success,” tying happiness to ever-shifting goals.
• Adaptation: A 2019 study in Nature found that species with simpler cognitive structures exhibit lower stress levels. Our advanced brains, ironically, fuel our unease.

---

The Modern Maze of Artificial Threats
Prehistoric humans feared predators. Modern humans fear Instagram comparisons and job-stealing robots. Our brains haven’t caught up to the breakneck pace of progress, leaving us trapped in a loop of “what’s next?” This dissonance breeds anxiety, FOMO, and a toxic quest for perfection.

Tolstoy’s Warning:
“We waste our lives in restless insecurity, preparing to live but never living.”

---

Stoic Wisdom: Taming the Infinite Human Appetite
From Buddha to Seneca, philosophers have dissected our discontent. The Stoics, in particular, offered two principles to quiet the chaos:

1.    Control the Controllable

o   Focus energy on what you can influence—your actions, mindset, and values. Let go of external noise (others’ opinions, societal benchmarks).

o   Example: Instead of stressing over a promotion, excel at your current role. The outcome? Not your burden.

2.    Embrace Suffering as a Teacher

o   Pain is inevitable; misery is optional. Stoics viewed challenges as growth opportunities, not setbacks.

o   Actionable Step: Journal daily about one hardship and its lesson. Reframe “Why me?” into “What now?”

---

Rewiring Our Restless Minds
Animals don’t overthink. Humans can’t stop. Yet, our curse of complexity is also our gift if harnessed. By adopting stoic principles, we can mute the noise of infinite wants and rediscover the joy of enough.

As you scroll through your polished social feeds tonight, ask: Would the lion trade its shade for your screen?

---

Sources

1.    Nietzsche, F. (1886). Beyond Good and Evil.

2.    Tolstoy, L. (1894). On the Significance of Science and Art.

3.    Nature Journal (2019). “Cognitive Complexity and Stress in Mammals.”

4.    Seneca. Letters from a Stoic.

Schema Markup:

• human anxiety, stoic philosophy, evolutionary discontent.
•  “Can humans ever be as content as animals?”).

 

Is the Curriculum Manufacturing Zombies?

The Hidden Cost of Patriotic Education in Shaping Minds

Uncover how patriotic education systems produce uncritical citizens, erase historical truths, and prioritise loyalty over intellectual freedom.

---

Imagine classrooms not as spaces of enlightenment, but as assembly lines churning out compliant, unthinking citizens. Across the globe, education systems are increasingly accused of “manufacturing zombies” students stripped of critical thought, programmed to regurgitate state-sanctioned narratives. This blog dissects how curricula, draped in the cloak of patriotism, risk creating intellectually passive generations. Are we teaching loyalty, or breeding ignorance? Let’s explore.

---

The Zombie Analogy: How Curricula Strip Critical Thinking

Much like zombies lack autonomy, students under rigid patriotic education systems are conditioned to accept "not question" dominant ideologies. Whether in democracies or authoritarian regimes, curricula often:

• Erase Global Contexts: Suppress multicultural histories to amplify nationalistic pride.
• Celebrate Selective Heroes: Glorify “founders” while sidelining oppressed voices (e.g., Indigenous communities, enslaved peoples).
• Rewire Moral Priorities: Replace ethical inquiry with slogans like “My country, right or wrong.”

The result? A citizenry trained to obey, not analyse.

---

Case Study: American Textbooks and the Art of Historical Amnesia

U.S. history curricula exemplify this phenomenon. While pioneers like Randall Curran and Charles Dorn (Patriotic Education in a Global Age) argue patriotism fosters social cohesion, textbooks often:

• Whitewash Colonial Violence: Frame European settlers as “hardworking pioneers,” ignoring Indigenous genocide.
• Mute Slavery’s Legacy: Reduce centuries of enslavement to a footnote, as if America’s prosperity was earned, not stolen.
• Sanitize Modern Failures: Skip critiques of Vietnam-era atrocities (e.g., My Lai) or systemic racism.

Such omissions don’t just distort history—they manufacture collective amnesia.

---

Patriotism vs. Intellectual Freedom: A Toxic Trade-Off

Proponents claim patriotic education unites societies. But at what cost?

• Suppressing Dissent: Critics are labelled “traitors,” stifling reforms (e.g., post-9/11 nationalism).
• Ethical Blindness: Justifying atrocities like the Jallianwala Bagh massacre as “patriotic duty.”
• Global Isolation: Rejecting multiculturalism breeds insularity, leaving nations unprepared for interconnected challenges.

As sociologist Zygmunt Bauman warned, “Unthinking loyalty is the enemy of progress.”

---

The Zombie Cure: Reclaiming Education for Critical Citizenship

To combat intellectual stagnation, reforms must:

1.    Teach Ugly Truths: Confront colonialism, slavery, and state violence head-on.

2.    Celebrate Global Minds: Integrate thinkers like Frantz Fanon or Arundhati Roy to challenge parochialism.

3.    Reward Skepticism: Grade students for asking “Why?” not memorizing “What.”

Finland’s model, which emphasizes critical thinking over rote learning, shows it’s possible to foster patriotism and curiosity.

---

From Zombies to Thinkers—A Call for Educational Rebellion

A curriculum that manufactures zombies betrays its purpose. True education should ignite minds, not numb them. Let’s redefine patriotism not as blind allegiance, but as a commitment to a nation’s better self—one that learns from its sins and strives for equity. The choice is ours: perpetuate intellectual decay or educate rebels who dare to think.

---

References

1.    Curran, R., & Dorn, C. (2018). Patriotic Education in a Global Age.

2.    Loewen, J. W. (2008). Lies My Teacher Told Me.

3.    Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity.

#Curriculum reform, patriotic education, critical thinking, historical amnesia, zombie students, intellectual freedom.

Is Aristotle the most important figure in history?

The Hidden Architect of Modern Civilisation?

Explore how Aristotle’s revolutionary methods in philosophy, science, and politics shaped modern thought. Was he history’s most influential mind? Discover the evidence.

---

The Silent Colossus of Human Thought

Was Aristotle humanity’s single most consequential mind? British philosopher John Sellars argues precisely this in his provocative analysis. While names like Einstein or Darwin dominate modern discourse, Aristotle’s fingerprints linger on every pillar of civilized society—from scientific inquiry to political theory, literary critique to digital logic. This blog unravels how a 2,400-year-old Greek philosopher silently engineered the frameworks of modern thought, asking: Can any individual rival his enduring influence?

---

The Bold Claim: A Philosopher Beyond Compare

In Aristotle: Understanding the World’s Greatest Philosopher, Sellars posits an audacious thesis: Aristotle isn’t merely philosophy’s crown jewel but the most impactful human ever born. “He redesigned how we think,” Sellars insists, comparing Aristotle’s influence to “invisible software running civilization’s hardware.” Though daunting to modern readers—Sellars admits initially finding Aristotle “impenetrable”—the philosopher’s methodical empiricism and analytical rigor laid tracks for disciplines as diverse as marine biology and constitutional law.

---

The Scholar’s Odyssey: From Plato’s Shadow to Alexander’s Mentor

Born in northern Greece (384 BCE), Aristotle’s intellectual journey began at 18 in Athens under Plato’s tutelage. For two decades, he absorbed and later challenged his mentor’s ideals, forging his own empirical worldview. After Plato’s death, Aristotle fled Athens, studied marine life on Lesbos, and tutored a young Alexander the Great—a pupil who’d later conquer the known world. Returning to Athens, he founded the Lyceum, a research hub where he lectured, dissected specimens, and authored treatises until his death at 62.

Though only fragments of his 1,000,000-word legacy survive, these shards reshaped human inquiry.

---

The Scientist Ahead of His Time

Aristotle’s true genius lay not in answers but in method. Lacking microscopes or labs, he cataloged 500 species, dissected embryos, and classified lifeforms—effectively inventing biology. While errors like “spontaneous generation” were later corrected, Sellars emphasizes his revolutionary approach: systematic observation and evidence-based reasoning. This empirical framework became science’s bedrock, proving more valuable than any single discovery.

---

Politics & Literature: Blueprints for Civilization

1. Comparative Governance

Aristotle didn’t just theorize politics—he compared it. Analyzing 158 Greek constitutions, he identified patterns in thriving societies, founding political science. His conclusion: balanced governance (a mix of democracy and oligarchy) fosters stability—an idea echoing in modern republics.

2. Storytelling’s DNA

His Poetics dissected Greek tragedy into components—plot, character, catharsis—that still define narratives today. From Shakespearean drama to Netflix series, Aristotle’s “beginning-middle-end” structure remains storytelling’s golden rule.

---

Logic & Ethics: The Code Beneath Modernity

The Birth of Logic

Aristotle’s Organon established formal logic, including the Law of Excluded Middle (every statement is true or false). This binary principle underpins not just philosophy but computer science—his 2,000-year-old “yes/no” framework drives today’s AI algorithms.

The Art of Living Well

For Aristotle, ethics meant balance: cultivating reason, nurturing friendships, and pursuing eudaimonia (flourishing). His “golden mean” ideal—virtue as moderation between extremes—resonates in psychology and self-help movements.

---

The Invisible Influence: Why We Forget Aristotle

Sellars notes a paradox: Aristotle’s ideas permeate daily life yet go unrecognized. Modern science, democratic debates, even screenplay workshops unknowingly echo his frameworks. “We swim in Aristotelian waters,” Sellars writes, “but credit later thinkers who merely refined his tools.”

---

The Unseen Pillar of Progress

Does Aristotle deserve the title of history’s most significant figure? Sellars’ evidence is compelling: he engineered the very tools humanity uses to dissect reality. Yet his anonymity in popular discourse makes his legacy all the more profound—a testament to ideas so foundational they became invisible. As you draft legislation, analyze data, or binge a series, ask: How much of this began with a curious Greek dissecting squid on a Mediterranean island?

---

References

1.    Sellars, J. (2023). Aristotle: Understanding the World’s Greatest Philosopher.

2.    Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics (Oxford Classical Texts).

3.    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: “Aristotle’s Logic.”

4.    Lloyd, G. E. R. (1968). Aristotle: The Growth and Structure of His Thought.

Schema Suggestion:

#What did Aristotle invent?

#How did Aristotle influence science?

---

#Aristotle’s influence, #founder of political science, #Aristotle logic, #empirical method, #Aristotle and Alexander the Great, #golden mean ethics.

 

What Is Morality? Kant vs. Schopenhauer

The Roots of Morality: Kant vs. Schopenhauer on Why We Do Good

Explore Kant's Categorical Imperative and Schopenhauer's philosophy of compassion in this deep dive into the roots of human morality. Discover where ethics truly begin.

---

The Eternal Question of Human Goodness

Why does the sight of a starving child wrench our hearts? Is altruism merely transactional—a bargain for divine reward—or does it spring from something deeper? For centuries, philosophers have grappled with the origins of morality. In this exploration, we unravel two seminal perspectives: Emmanuel Kant’s rigid universalism and Arthur Schopenhauer’s empathetic worldview. Prepare to question whether ethics are divine edicts, rational constructs, or reflections of our innate character.

---

Kant’s Moral Architecture: Duty Over Desire

The Categorical Imperative: Morality as Universal Law

Kant dismissed religion as a foundation for ethics, arguing that moral truths must transcend dogma. His "Categorical Imperative" posits: Act only according to maxims that could become universal laws. For Kant, morality is not hypothetical (“If I want X, I must do Y”) but categorical—binding in all circumstances.

• Example: Lying to avoid trouble fails Kant’s test. If everyone lied, trust would collapse. Thus, truth-telling becomes a non-negotiable duty.
• Critique of Religious Ethics: Kant warned that conflating faith and morality invites conflict, as religious codes often clash. True ethics, he argued, emerge from reason alone.

The Limits of Human Freedom

Kant acknowledged that most actions (Hypothetical Imperatives) stem from desires (e.g., career choices). But moral acts (Categorical Imperatives) demand obedience to duty, irrespective of personal gain. Here, freedom lies not in choice but in surrendering to rational duty.

---

Schopenhauer’s Rebellion: Compassion as the Core of Morality

Character Over Code: The Lens of Inherent Nature

Schopenhauer dismantled Kant’s rigid framework, asserting that ethics arise not from reason but from character. In The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics, he argued:

1.    Actions Reveal Character: A person’s deeds reflect their innate nature, not free will.

2.    The Three Motivators: Self-interest, malice, or compassion drive all moral decisions.

• The Illusion of Choice: Just as a lens distorts light, our character distorts perception. A religious donor helps the poor through a “scriptural lens”; a secular person acts from innate empathy. Both are slaves to their nature.

The Primacy of Compassion

Unlike Kant, Schopenhauer celebrated emotion as ethical bedrock. He derided cold rationality, noting how clever minds often justify cruelty. Compassion—feeling another’s pain as our own—emerged as humanity’s noblest impulse, transcending logic and self-interest.

---

Kant vs. Schopenhauer: A Clash of Titans

Aspect	Kant	Schopenhauer
Source of Ethics	Reason	Innate Character
Moral Driver	Duty	Compassion
Human Freedom	Freedom to obey rational law	Illusion—actions bound by nature
Role of Religion	Irrelevant to universal ethics	Shapes perspective, not morality

---

Conclusion: Where Does Morality Truly Reside?

Kant’s ethics demand unwavering duty; Schopenhauer’s weep with the suffering. The debate remains unresolved, but its implications are profound: Are we architects of morality, or merely its vessels? Whether you align with Kant’s rational imperatives or Schopenhauer’s call for compassion, one truth endures: Ethics are less about divine decrees and more about the essence of who we are—or who we strive to become.

In the end, the choice to reflect—or ignore—this question is itself a moral act.

---

References

1.    Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.

2.    Schopenhauer, A. (1841). The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics.

3.    Durant, W. (1926). The Story of Philosophy.

---

#Emmanuel Kant (22 April 1724 – 12 February 1804) a German philosopher and one of the central Enlightenment thinkers.

#Arthur Schopenhauer (22 February 1788 – 21 September 1860) a German philosopher, #Kant’s Categorical Imperative, #Schopenhauer compassion, #roots of morality, #ethics philosophy, #human goodness.