Translate

Showing posts with label ideology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ideology. Show all posts

Monday, December 9, 2024

The end of Bashar al-Assad and the future of Syria

Bashar al-Assad: From an Eye Doctor in London to Syria's Controversial Leader

Bashar al-Assad's journey from a medical professional to an authoritarian leader accused of war crimes is marked by significant events and dramatic turns. Here's a timeline of key moments in his life and presidency:



Early Life and Background (1965–1994)

  • 1965: Born to Hafez al-Assad and Anisa Makhlouf, Bashar grew up in a politically tumultuous Syria under Arab nationalist Ba'athist rule.
  • 1992: After studying medicine in Damascus, he moved to London for specialization in ophthalmology.
  • 1994: Bashar’s elder brother, Basil, the heir apparent, died in a car accident. This tragedy redirected Bashar's path towards politics and leadership.
    Assad with his British-born wife Asma and their children


Rise to Power (1994–2000)

  • 1994: Returned to Syria to begin military training and prepare for leadership under his father's guidance.
  • 2000: After Hafez al-Assad’s death, Bashar assumed Syria's presidency at 34, following constitutional amendments lowering the minimum age for the role.

Early Presidency: Hopes and Setbacks (2000–2010)

  • Initially, Bashar promoted transparency, modernisation, and political reforms, sparking a brief period of optimism known as the "Damascus Spring."
  • 2001: Crackdown on dissent marked the end of this hopeful period, with arrests and suppression of opposition.
  • Introduced limited economic reforms benefiting elites, notably his cousin Rami Makhlouf.
  • 2003: Relations with the West soured after Syria opposed the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, facing accusations of aiding insurgents.
  • 2005: International pressure intensified after Lebanon's former PM Rafik Hariri was assassinated, leading to Syrian troops' withdrawal from Lebanon.

Civil War and International Isolation (2011–2020)

  • 2011: Inspired by Arab Spring protests, demonstrations in Syria escalated into a full-scale civil war.
  • Bashar’s government faced accusations of severe repression, war crimes, and chemical attacks.
  • Opposition movements fragmented, with extremist groups like ISIS seizing control of parts of Syria.
  • 2015: Russia’s military intervention helped Assad regain key territories, solidifying his position but prolonging the conflict.

Recent Years: Fragile Stability and Challenges (2020–Present)

  • 2023: Syria rejoined the Arab League, signaling regional reintegration despite ongoing economic struggles.
  • October 2023: Amidst regional conflicts, opposition groups led by Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham advanced, capturing major cities like Aleppo and Homs, and claimed to seize Damascus.
  • Reports suggested Assad fled Damascus, marking a critical point in his presidency.

How Did Bashar al-Assad Flee Syria?

With Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham taking control of key cities, questions are arising about Bashar al-Assad’s future and whether his regime has finally come to an end. The last time Assad was seen in public was a week ago during a meeting with Iran’s foreign minister, where he reiterated his commitment to “crushing” the rebels advancing swiftly across various parts of Syria.

In the early hours of Sunday, as fighters entered Damascus unopposed, Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham and its allies declared, “The tyrant Bashar al-Assad has fled Syria.” According to the FlightRadar24 website, there were no scheduled flights leaving Damascus during this time. However, at 12:56 a.m., a Cham Wings Airlines Airbus A320 departed for Sharjah in the UAE.

FlightRadar24 data showed the plane initially heading east of Damascus before turning northwest toward Syria’s Mediterranean coast, a stronghold of Assad’s Alawite community and home to Russian military bases. The aircraft’s transponder signal was lost at 4:39 a.m. while flying 13 kilometers west of Homs at an altitude of 1,625 feet.

In a post on social media platform X, FlightRadar24 stated that the aircraft’s outdated transponder might have caused some data loss. It added that the region experienced GPS jamming, which could also explain the missing data, and noted the absence of any known airports nearby.

Radar showed a plane heading towards the Mediterranean Sea from Damascus

Bashar al-Assad's escape from Syria on December 8, 2024, marks a pivotal moment in the country's ongoing conflict. As rebel forces advanced towards Damascus, Assad fled with his family on a Syrian Air flight that took off around 2 AM. The plane initially appeared to head towards the coast but then changed course and disappeared from radar, likely to avoid detection.

Russian officials played a crucial role in facilitating his escape, ensuring that he was transported securely out of the country. Following his departure, celebrations erupted among opposition groups, signaling a significant victory over Assad's regime.

Once in Russia, Assad and his family were granted asylum, reflecting Russia's long-standing support for him. His escape has led to a shift in power dynamics within Syria, which is now under a transitional administration backed by rebel factions. This event raises questions about the future governance of Syria and the ongoing implications of the conflict.


Syria’s Role in the Arab World: The Rise, Fall, and Beyond

Henry Kissinger once remarked, "The Arabs can't make war without Egypt and can't make peace without Syria." This sentiment highlights Syria's critical role in shaping the political and strategic dynamics of the Arab world. Once a symbol of resistance against Western dominance and Israeli influence, Syria now finds itself at a pivotal crossroads. With the end of Alawite rule after more than five decades, the region faces a complex interplay of power shifts, alliances, and uncertainties.

Syria: The Guardian of Arab Resistance

Damascus, often referred to as the world’s oldest continuously inhabited capital, has historically played a central role in the Arab-Israeli conflict. After Egypt’s withdrawal from the confrontation front following the 1971 Arab-Israeli War, Syria, under Hafez al-Assad, emerged as Israel’s most formidable Arab opponent. Kissinger, despite ideological differences, reportedly admired Assad's strategic acumen.

For decades, Syria was a bastion of defiance against U.S. hegemony and Israeli expansionism. Yet, the brutal nature of the Alawite regime, characterized by oppression and minority rule over a Sunni majority, sowed seeds of domestic unrest that ultimately eroded its stability.

A Nation at a Crossroads: Freedom or Decline?

The abrupt end of Alawite dominance presents a dual narrative. For some, it signifies the liberation of Syria from an oppressive regime; for others, it marks the decline of a nation once emblematic of Arab dignity.

Syria's current state reflects a complex paradox. On one hand, its fall from grace as a regional power weakens the broader Arab resistance against foreign intervention. On the other, the dissolution of autocratic rule offers a glimmer of hope for democratic governance, albeit fraught with challenges.

Winners and Losers in the New Geopolitical Order

The consequences of Syria’s transformation are far-reaching, with implications for multiple stakeholders:

United States and Israel: The fall of the Assad regime is a significant geopolitical victory for both nations, as it dismantles a key axis of resistance. For Israel, this creates an opportunity to shift from perpetual conflict to strategic peacebuilding.

Turkey: President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan emerges as a major beneficiary. With increasing influence in northern Syria and ties to groups like Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, Turkey is poised to shape Syria’s future. This success also facilitates the repatriation of Syrian refugees, a critical domestic goal for Erdoğan.

Iran and Hezbollah: The Assad regime’s collapse is a severe blow to Iran’s regional ambitions and Hezbollah’s operational leverage in Lebanon. This weakens their collective ability to challenge U.S. and Israeli interests.

Palestine: Perhaps the greatest casualty, the Palestinian cause faces increased isolation as key allies, such as Syria and Iran, falter.

How Do Iran and Israel View the Situation?

This marks the end of 50 years of Assad family rule, a shift that will alter the region’s power dynamics. Iran, which wielded significant influence through its alliance with Assad, has suffered a major setback. Under Assad, Syria served as a vital link between Iran and Hezbollah, facilitating the transfer of arms and ammunition.

With Hezbollah weakened after a year of conflict with Israel, its future remains uncertain. Similarly, Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen have faced repeated airstrikes. Along with other groups like militias in Iraq and Hamas in Gaza, these factions formed Iran’s “axis of resistance.” This network now faces severe disruption.

Israel is likely to welcome this development, viewing Iran as a threat. Many believe that Turkey’s involvement was crucial in these events. While Turkey supports Syrian rebels, it has denied backing Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan had previously urged Assad to pursue a diplomatic solution to facilitate the return of Syrian refugees, a politically sensitive issue in Turkey where their number has reached three million. Assad, however, refused.

A Broader Geopolitical Domino Effect

The U.S. success in Syria reflects a larger strategy aimed at weakening adversaries like Russia and Iran. Caught in the quagmire of the Ukraine war, Russia’s inability to support Assad underscores its diminished global influence. The removal of Russian military bases in Syria could redirect Moscow’s focus toward strengthening its position in Eastern Europe.

China, too, cannot ignore the ripple effects. As America solidifies its influence in the Middle East, Beijing faces a strategic dilemma: whether to challenge U.S. dominance or adapt to a shifting global order.

Who Are Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham?

Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) emerged in 2011 as Jabhat al-Nusra, an al-Qaeda affiliate. Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the former leader of the so-called Islamic State, played a role in its creation. Initially considered Assad’s most dangerous adversary, the group severed ties with al-Qaeda in 2016 under Abu Muhammad al-Jolani’s leadership. HTS then merged with other factions to form a coalition.


While no longer aligned with al-Qaeda, HTS shifted its focus from establishing a global caliphate to creating a fundamentalist regime within Syria. Despite efforts to portray itself as a national force with diplomatic and conciliatory rhetoric, many remain skeptical of HTS’s intentions.

 

What Lies Ahead?

As rebels entered Damascus, Assad’s forces either abandoned their posts or joined the insurgents. In a televised announcement, the group proclaimed Assad’s ousting and declared, “Long live a free and independent Syria for all its people.” While many celebrate Assad’s departure, uncertainty looms over what follows.

HTS, with its roots in al-Qaeda and a history of violence, has attempted to rebrand itself. Yet, doubts persist about its governance after toppling Assad. This power vacuum in Syria could lead to further chaos and violence.

Lessons for the Muslim World

A united and conscious populace wields more power than any military: Scottish philosopher David Hume.

Syria’s political upheaval offers a stark reminder of a timeless truth: regimes that lose the support of their people are destined to fall. For countries like Pakistan, this lesson is especially relevant as they navigate their own internal challenges.

The downfall of the Asad dynasty serves as a compelling lesson: the true bedrock of a nation's stability lies in the contentment of its people. Overreliance on external support—be it military, financial, or political—can never substitute for the trust and acceptance that citizens place in their rulers. Stability is not granted by foreign alliances but is earned through the confidence and satisfaction of those governed.


Uncertain Future

The fall of the Alawite regime in Syria is both an end and a beginning. It signifies the closure of a chapter defined by autocratic rule and the potential for a new era of governance, albeit one fraught with uncertainties. For the broader Arab world, Syria’s trajectory underscores the delicate balance between resistance and survival in a rapidly shifting geopolitical landscape.

As the dust settles, one question remains: can Syria rise again as a beacon of dignity and resistance, or will it succumb to the tides of external influence and internal strife?



 

Wednesday, December 4, 2024

Is India Still Secular? A Reflection on Changing Ideals

The Question of India's Secular Identity

India, once celebrated as a secular beacon in the diverse and fragmented subcontinent, now stands at a critical juncture. The ideals championed by visionaries like Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru—of unity, pluralism, and secular governance—appear increasingly tenuous. Under the strains of political populism, religious nationalism, and socio-cultural shifts, the foundational question resurfaces: Was India ever truly secular, or was this merely an aspirational ideal? More importantly, is India today edging closer to the divisive principles of the two-nation theory it once firmly rejected?

 

This article delves into the roots of Indian secularism, its current challenges, and the implications for the nation’s pluralistic ethos.

 

 The Foundations of Indian Secularism

 Gandhi’s Vision: Unity Through Nonviolence

Mahatma Gandhi envisioned secularism not as the negation of religion but as the harmonious coexistence of all faiths. For Gandhi, India’s strength lay in its diversity—its Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians living as one. His philosophy of Ahimsa (nonviolence) was not merely a political tool but a moral framework designed to bridge interfaith divides, fostering mutual respect and collective harmony.

 

 Nehru’s Pragmatism: Secularism as a Shield Against Fragmentation

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, viewed secularism as indispensable to preserving national unity, particularly after the trauma of Partition. For him, secular governance was a safeguard against the divisive potential of religion in politics. Nehru institutionalized these ideals, culminating in the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1976, which formally declared India a secular state. Yet, this vision began to falter after his death, as sectarian politics gained ground, exposing the fragility of the ideal in a deeply religious society.

 


 The Erosion of Secularism: A Nation Divided

 The Rise of Religious Nationalism

The advent of Hindutva—a vision of India rooted in Hindu cultural supremacy—has significantly accelerated the erosion of India’s secular fabric. Spearheaded by organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and promoted by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), this ideology marginalizes minorities, particularly Muslims, while rewriting India’s cultural and historical narratives. Renaming cities and landmarks with Islamic origins, such as changing Allahabad to Prayagraj, exemplifies this effort. These symbolic acts aim to erase the contributions of Muslims to India’s history, casting them as outsiders in the very nation they helped shape.

 

 The Social Isolation of Muslims

In regions like Uttar Pradesh, the syncretic culture of Ganga-Jamuni Tehzeeb—a blend of Hindu and Muslim traditions—is under siege. Muslims increasingly face social exclusion, with narratives of "othering" infiltrating everyday life. Traditions where Muslims once actively participated, such as crafting effigies for Hindu festivals or supporting pilgrimages like the Kumbh Mela, have seen calls for their exclusion.

 

Rewriting History: The Erasure of Muslim Contributions

The cultural marginalization of Muslims extends to linguistic and symbolic domains. Persian-derived terms are being replaced with Sanskritized alternatives, a calculated move to diminish India’s Islamic heritage. Such efforts echo the concerns of scholars like Amrita Basu, who argue that Hindutva’s agenda has evolved from militant activism to cultural domination, reshaping India’s collective memory.

 

The Politics of Polarization: From Congress to BJP

The communal divide in India predates the BJP’s rise. The 1984 anti-Sikh riots under Congress exposed the party’s failure to uphold secular principles, paving the way for the BJP’s Hindutva-driven politics. Under BJP rule, policies like the abrogation of Article 370, the construction of the Ram Temple, and the push for a Uniform Civil Code have institutionalized the shift away from secularism. These measures signal a deliberate reorientation of India’s identity, aligning it more closely with majoritarian ideals.

 

 Is India Embracing the Two-Nation Theory?

Ironically, the trajectory of modern Indian politics seems to lend credence to the two-nation theory—a philosophy that argued Hindus and Muslims could not coexist within a single nation. While Muhammad Ali Jinnah was once criticized for his divisive vision, today’s India appears to echo the same principles, fostering exclusion and alienation. By marginalising minorities and promoting religious hegemony, India risks further fracturing its social fabric. Whether this is a temporary phase or an irreversible shift remains a question of profound significance.

 

A Secular Future or a Religious State?

India’s transition from a secular ideal to a polarised reality presents a stark challenge to its pluralistic heritage. While the resurgence of religious nationalism threatens to redefine the nation’s identity, history offers a glimmer of hope. India has always thrived on its diversity, and reclaiming its secular ethos requires a collective effort to reject divisive narratives and uphold constitutional principles. The future of India’s secular identity depends on whether its leaders and citizens can rise above sectarianism and reaffirm the pluralism that has long been its hallmark. Whether this period of polarisation is a passing tremor or a seismic shift will ultimately define the nation's legacy.