Understanding the complex relationship between two nations that have never officially met diplomatically
Quick Facts Overview
Aspect |
Pakistan |
Israel |
Independence |
August 14, 1947 |
May 14, 1948 |
Population |
~240 million |
~9.5 million |
Religion |
Islamic Republic |
Jewish State |
Diplomatic Relations |
None - No recognition |
No formal relations |
Key Ally |
China, Saudi Arabia |
United States, India |
1. Historical Background: When Did They Emerge?
Pakistan gained independence on August 14, 1947,
created through the partition of British India as a homeland for Muslims.
Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948,
established after the end of the British Mandate for Palestine and UN Partition
Plan Resolution 181.
Both nations were born from the collapse of British colonial
rule, emerging within one year of each other during a period of global
decolonization.
2. Religious Foundation: Are They Similar?
Common Ground
- Both
are Abrahamic religions (Islam and Judaism)
- Both
believe in one God (monotheism)
- Both
have prophetic traditions
- Both
emphasize justice and community values
Historical Perspective on Ideological Similarity
General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq once observed: "Pakistan is
like Israel, an ideological state. Take out Judaism from Israel and it will
collapse like a house of cards. Take Islam out of Pakistan and make it a
secular state; it would collapse."
Based on this ideology, General Zia-ul-Haq implemented
several policies to transform Pakistan into a more Islamic state during his
military rule (1977-1988), institutionalizing religious elements in government,
military, and society.
Key Differences
Feature |
Pakistan |
Israel |
Official Status |
Islamic Republic |
Jewish and Democratic State |
Government Type |
Mix of Islamic law + British common law |
Secular democracy with religious elements |
Religious Diversity |
96% Muslim, minorities protected |
74% Jewish, 21% Arab, others |
Fundamentalism Level |
Conservative Islamic elements, not uniformly
fundamentalist |
Secular majority with influential Orthodox minority |
Bottom Line: Both are religion-based states, but
neither is uniformly fundamentalist. As General Zia-ul-Haq noted, both derive
their core identity from religious foundations, though they represent different
approaches to integrating faith and governance in modern nation-states.
3. Why No Diplomatic Relations?
Pakistan's Position:
- No
recognition of Israel since 1948
- Demands
Palestinian state with pre-1967 borders
- Requires
East Jerusalem as Palestinian capital
- Conditions
any normalization on Palestinian independence
Rare Exceptions:
- Secret
foreign minister meeting in 2005
- Occasional
Track II diplomatic contacts
- Recent
quiet discussions about potential shifts (no official change)
Pakistani Public Opinion: 91% negative view of
Israel, with overwhelming support for Palestine.
4. The Alliance Networks
Pakistan's Support for Palestine
✅ Historical military support
- pilots and advisors to Arab states in 1967 and 1973 Arab-Israeli wars
✅
Political advocacy - strong diplomatic voice for Palestine in UN and
Islamic forums
✅
Non-recognition policy - refuses to acknowledge Israel's existence
✅
Humanitarian aid - provides financial and humanitarian assistance to
Palestinian civilians
✅
Two-state solution - officially supports Palestinian statehood since
1988
Important Note: Pakistan does NOT sponsor proxy
groups like Hamas or Hezbollah. These are primarily Iranian-backed
organizations. Pakistan's support for Palestine is diplomatic, humanitarian,
and state-to-state.
Israel's Partnership with India
✅ Major arms supplier -
Phalcon AWACS, Barak missiles, Heron drones
✅
Intelligence cooperation - shared security concerns about terrorism
✅
Technology partnerships - joint defense projects and R&D
5. Geographic Distance & Strategic Reach
Distance Between Nations
- Islamabad
to Tel Aviv: ~3,600 km (2,237 miles)
- Western
Pakistan to Israel: ~2,400-2,500 km
- Flight
time: 4-5 hours direct (if airspace permitted)
Can They Attack Each Other?
Conventional War: Extremely difficult
- Would
require overflying hostile airspace
- No
shared borders or direct access routes
- Massive
logistical challenges
Missile Strikes: Technically possible
- Both
possess long-range ballistic missiles
- Most
likely form of direct military confrontation
Cyber Warfare: Both have advanced capabilities
6. Missile Capabilities: Range Analysis
Missile Comparison Table
Country |
Missile System |
Type |
Range (km) |
Can Reach Target? |
Pakistan |
Shaheen-III |
Medium-Range Ballistic |
2,750 |
✅ Yes (from western sites) |
Pakistan |
Ababeel |
Medium-Range Ballistic |
2,200 |
✅ Yes |
Israel |
Jericho III |
Intercontinental Ballistic |
6,500+ |
✅ Yes (easily) |
Israel |
Popeye Turbo |
Sea-Launched Cruise |
1,500 |
✅ Yes (from Arabian Sea) |
Key Insight: Israel has superior range and can strike
Pakistan from multiple platforms. Pakistan can reach Israel but requires
strategic positioning in western regions.
7. Military Strength Comparison (2025)
Personnel & Equipment
Category |
Pakistan |
Israel |
Advantage |
Active Personnel |
654,000 |
173,000 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Reserve Personnel |
550,000 |
465,000 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Tanks |
3,742 |
1,370 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Aircraft |
1,434 |
612 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Fighter Jets |
387 |
241 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Nuclear Warheads |
~170 |
~90 |
🇵🇰 Pakistan |
Defense Budget |
$10.4B |
$24.3B |
🇮🇱 Israel |
Quality vs Quantity Analysis
- Pakistan:
Strength in numbers, manpower, and nuclear arsenal
- Israel:
Superior technology, training, precision weapons, and cyber capabilities
- Outcome:
In short conflicts, Israeli tech advantage decisive. In prolonged wars,
Pakistani numbers matter.
8. Economic Power Comparison
Metric |
Pakistan |
Israel |
Analysis |
GDP (Nominal) |
$376 billion |
$522 billion |
Israel 40% larger despite tiny population |
GDP Per Capita |
$1,600 |
$55,000 |
Israelis 34x wealthier on average |
Economic Type |
Agriculture + textiles |
High-tech "Start-up Nation" |
Vastly different development models |
Global Status |
Mid-tier, debt challenges |
Advanced, innovation leader |
Israel punches far above its weight |
9. Game-Changer: The Saudi-Pakistan Defense Partnership
What's Actually Happening?
According to Velina Tchakarova, Director of the Austrian
Institute for European and Security Policy, the recent defense agreement
between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan represents a "sudden and surprising
geopolitical development."
This isn't just diplomatic cooperation - it signals Saudi
Arabia is no longer fully satisfied with relying solely on American security
guarantees.
Why Saudi Arabia is Looking Beyond the U.S.
For decades, Gulf security operated on a simple U.S. deal: oil
and gas in exchange for protection. But cracks appeared:
2019: Iran-aligned Houthis attacked Saudi Arabia -
limited U.S. response
2022: Similar attacks on UAE - again, muted American reaction
Result: Gulf states now seek more reliable, long-term
security partners beyond just the United States.
What the Partnership Actually Includes
Military Components
- Military
Access: Pakistan can potentially station missiles and other military
assets on Saudi soil
- Nuclear
Umbrella: Pakistan's 170+ warheads provide powerful deterrent for
Saudi Arabia
- Defense
Technology: Shared military expertise and equipment
Financial Backbone: The Numbers
Investment Area |
Amount |
Significance |
Overall Investment |
Up to $25 billion |
Massive economic infusion for Pakistan |
Minerals & Petroleum |
Billions via Saudi Fund |
Taps Pakistan's natural resources |
Central Bank Deposit |
Up to $2 billion |
Bolsters Pakistan's foreign reserves |
Bottom Line: Saudi Arabia gains military might and
nuclear deterrent. Pakistan gains financial lifeline and strategic backing.
Historical Context: Why the West is Concerned
This partnership has consistently made Western powers
nervous:
1998 Nuclear Tests:
- Pakistan
conducted first nuclear tests
- Prince
Sultan bin Abdulaziz Al Saud (Saudi Defense Minister) immediately flew to
Islamabad
- Clinton
administration reaction: Called the visit "worrisome"
- Reports
emerged that the Prince toured Pakistan's secret nuclear facilities
The "Silent Financier" Theory: Some
analysts describe Saudi Arabia as the "silent financier" of
Pakistan's nuclear program, explaining decades of unwavering mutual support
despite international pressure.
Why This Changes Everything
For Israel: 🚨 Major Strategic
Shift
- Pakistan's
nuclear deterrent now potentially extends to Gulf region
- Complicates
Israeli military calculations against Saudi targets
- Creates
new hostile axis with shared religious foundation
For Gulf States: 💪 Enhanced Security
Architecture
- Access
to battle-tested Pakistani military expertise
- Nuclear
umbrella against Iranian threats
- Alternative
to exclusive U.S. dependence
For Global Powers: 🌍 New Multipolar
Reality
- End
of unchallenged American influence in Gulf
- China's
Belt and Road Initiative gains Gulf access through Pakistan
- Traditional
alliance systems becoming more complex
10. Current Global Standing
Israel's Position
📉 Declining global
support
- 62%
negative global opinion in recent surveys
- Growing
criticism over Palestinian policies
- Strong
regional partnerships through Abraham Accords
📈 Growing strategic
alliances
- Deeper
ties with India, Arab Gulf states
- Advanced
technology partnerships
- Military
cooperation expanding
Pakistan's Position
📈 Rising strategic
importance
- Key
partner in China's Belt and Road Initiative
- Critical
player in Gulf security architecture
- Improved
economic stability (2.7% growth)
📊 Mixed international
standing
- Still
faces terrorism financing concerns
- Growing
diplomatic relevance
- Nuclear
power status brings global attention
11. Hypothetical Conflict Scenarios: What If
Pakistan-Israel Face Off?
Scenario 1: Israeli Strike on Saudi Arabia - Pakistan's
Response Options
New Reality: With Pakistan's potential military
assets stationed on Saudi soil and $25 billion in investments at stake, any
Israeli strike on Saudi Arabia would directly threaten Pakistani interests.
Direct Missile Response
✅ Enhanced Capability
- Shaheen-III
missiles potentially pre-positioned in Saudi Arabia
- 1,000+
km closer to Israeli targets than from Pakistan
- Multiple
launch points complicate Israeli defense systems
❌ Escalation Risks
- Would
activate the defense partnership
- Nuclear-armed
conflict between two nations
- Global
economic disruption (oil markets, trade routes)
Financial Warfare Dimension
New Economic Stakes:
- $25
billion Saudi investment in Pakistan at risk
- $2
billion in Saudi central bank deposits vulnerable
- Massive
petroleum and minerals projects could be targeted
Economic Retaliation Options:
- Pakistan
could coordinate with Saudi Arabia to restrict oil supplies
- Financial
markets disruption through coordinated economic measures
- Targeting
Israeli economic interests in Gulf region
Scenario 2: Utilizing Saudi Aviation Assets
Saudi Arabian Airlines Military Use
Logistics Support:
- Civilian
aircraft converted for military transport
- Rapid
deployment of Pakistani troops/equipment
- Supply
chain support for extended operations
Intelligence Operations:
- Modified
aircraft for reconnaissance missions
- Electronic
warfare and communications platforms
- Surveillance
of Israeli positions
Saudi Air Force Integration
- Pakistani
pilots flying Saudi aircraft
- Joint
air operations and training
- Shared
intelligence and targeting data
Scenario 3: Full-Scale Pakistan-Israel War
Phase 1: Long-Range Exchange
Pakistani Capabilities:
- Multiple
Shaheen-III launches from western positions
- Ababeel
missiles targeting Israeli infrastructure
- Potential
for 20-30 simultaneous strikes
Israeli Response:
- Jericho
III missiles (6,500+ km range) easily reach all of Pakistan
- Superior
accuracy and multiple warhead capability
- Arrow-3
and David's Sling defend against incoming missiles
Phase 2: Escalation Scenarios
Conventional Escalation:
- Israel
targets Pakistani nuclear facilities
- Pakistan
strikes Israeli population centers
- Cyber
warfare targeting critical infrastructure
Nuclear Threshold:
- Pakistan:
~170 warheads available
- Israel:
~90 warheads (unofficial)
- Mutual
Assured Destruction becomes reality
Geographic and Logistical Challenges
Distance Factor Analysis
Launch Location |
Distance to Target |
Flight Time |
Detection Window |
Western Pakistan → Israel |
2,400-2,750 km |
8-12 minutes |
High detection probability |
Central Pakistan → Israel |
3,000-3,500 km |
12-18 minutes |
Very high detection |
Israel → Western Pakistan |
2,400-2,750 km |
8-12 minutes |
High detection |
Israel → Eastern Pakistan |
4,000+ km |
15-20 minutes |
Maximum detection time |
Airspace Complications
Pakistani Aircraft Routes to Middle East:
- Must
overfly Iran (hostile to Israel) or India (hostile to Pakistan)
- Alternative:
Long route via China-Central Asia-Turkey
- Refueling
requirements make sustained operations difficult
Israeli Aircraft Routes to Pakistan:
- Must
overfly multiple hostile territories
- Jordan/Iraq
route faces air defense challenges
- Red
Sea-Arabian Sea naval route possible but exposed
Military Capability Comparison in Direct Conflict
Pakistani Advantages
- Numbers:
3x more active personnel
- Nuclear
Arsenal: Nearly double the warheads
- Missile
Quantity: More diverse missile inventory
- Geographic
Depth: Harder to completely neutralize
Israeli Advantages
- Technology:
Superior precision-guided weapons
- Air
Superiority: Advanced fighter jets and air defenses
- Intelligence:
Comprehensive satellite and cyber capabilities
- Experience:
Recent combat experience and battle-tested systems
International Intervention Scenarios
Immediate Response (0-24 hours)
- US,
China, Russia emergency consultations
- UN
Security Council emergency session
- Naval
forces deployed to prevent escalation
Extended Conflict (24+ hours)
- Global
economic markets crash
- Oil
prices spike dramatically
- International
coalitions form to force ceasefire
Realistic Assessment: Probability and Outcomes
Most Likely Scenario
Limited Exchange:
- Pakistan
fires 2-5 missiles at Israeli military targets
- Israel
responds with precision strikes on Pakistani military installations
- International
pressure forces immediate ceasefire
- Both
sides claim victory, avoid nuclear escalation
Worst-Case Scenario
Nuclear Exchange:
- Pakistan
launches first nuclear strike if facing existential threat
- Israel
retaliates with multiple nuclear warheads
- Regional
nuclear winter affects entire Middle East-South Asia
- Global
economic collapse and humanitarian catastrophe
Probability Assessment
- Limited
conventional exchange: 15-20% if major trigger event occurs
- Extended
conventional war: <5% (geography prevents sustained operations)
- Nuclear
exchange: <1% (mutual destruction doctrine prevents)
Key Factors Preventing Full-Scale War
- Geographic
separation makes sustained conventional war nearly impossible
- Nuclear
deterrence creates mutual destruction scenario
- International
pressure would be immediate and overwhelming
- Economic
costs would be catastrophic for both nations
- No
territorial disputes reduce direct confrontation triggers
Bottom Line on Pakistan-Israel Direct Conflict
While both nations possess the technical capability to
strike each other with missiles, a full-scale war remains highly improbable due
to:
- Geographic
constraints limiting conventional operations
- Nuclear
deterrence creating unacceptable escalation risks
- International
intervention that would be swift and decisive
- Lack
of direct territorial disputes that typically trigger wars
Any conflict would likely remain limited to symbolic missile
exchanges before international pressure forces de-escalation. The real
competition remains diplomatic, technological, and through regional alliance
building rather than direct military confrontation.
12. The U.S. Dilemma: Can America Keep Everyone in Line?
The U.S. Challenge
The U.S. has historically maintained relationships with
multiple regional powers, but faces growing complexity as these relationships
evolve independently.
Current Complications
- Diverse
regional partnerships make unified alliance structures challenging
- China's
growing influence through Pakistan's Belt and Road participation
- Independent
decision-making by traditional partners reduces U.S. leverage
U.S. Approach
- Relationship
management: Maintain separate bilateral ties
- Conflict
prevention: Use diplomatic channels to prevent escalations
- Shared
interest focus: Emphasize common concerns like regional stability
- Adaptive
strategy: Recognize changing regional dynamics
Assessment: The U.S. maintains significant influence
but faces a more complex, multipolar regional environment where traditional
partners pursue independent strategic goals.
13. Key Takeaways
The Big Picture
- Saudi-Pakistan
defense partnership changes regional balance - Up to $25B investment
creates real military alliance
- Pakistan
supports Palestine diplomatically, not through proxies - Iran sponsors
Hamas/Hezbollah, not Pakistan
- Nuclear
deterrent now extends to Gulf - Pakistan's 170+ warheads provide Saudi
security umbrella
- End
of exclusive U.S. Gulf dominance - Multipolar security arrangements
emerging
- Economic-military
integration - Financial backing strengthens Pakistan's regional
military role
What's Next?
- Watch
for China's growing influence through Pakistan
- Monitor
U.S. response to shifting Gulf dynamics
- Track
Iran's reaction to Pakistan-Saudi alliance
- Observe
Israel's strategic adjustments to new realities
The Bottom Line
Pakistan and Israel represent two different models of
nation-building: one built on population and strategic partnerships, the other
on technology and innovation. Their indirect rivalry now shapes Middle East
politics through diplomatic channels and shifting alliance structures. The
Saudi-Pakistan defense partnership fundamentally alters regional power
dynamics, creating a new multipolar order where traditional U.S. dominance
faces serious challenges. The real story is how economic-military integration between
nuclear-armed Pakistan and resource-rich Saudi Arabia reshapes the strategic
landscape of the 21st century.
This analysis is based on verified information from
multiple sources. Regional dynamics continue to evolve rapidly.
Sources and References
Missile Capabilities
- Pakistan's
Shaheen-III: Range of 2,750 km confirmed by Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) Missile Threat database and Arms Control
Association
- Israel's
Jericho III: Range of 4,800-6,500 km (potentially up to 11,500 km with
reduced payload) according to CSIS Missile Threat database and nuclear
weapons research
Military Data Sources
- Global
Firepower Index 2025
- Stockholm
International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI)
- Center
for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
- Arms
Control Association databases
Economic Data Sources
- International
Monetary Fund (IMF) World Economic Outlook
- World
Bank Global Economic Prospects
- CIA
World Factbook
Saudi-Pakistan Defense Partnership Sources
- Tchakarova,
V. (2024). X Post on Saudi-Pakistan Pact - Austrian Institute for
European and Security Policy
- "Shifting
Sands: Gulf Security After the Iran Nuclear Deal" (2023). The
Economist
- "Saudi
Arabia Considers $25 Billion Investment in Pakistan" (2024).
Bloomberg
- Riedel,
B. (2008). "Saudi Arabia: Nervously Watching Pakistan." The
Brookings Institution
- Jehl,
D. (1999). "U.S. Suspects Pakistan Gave Saudi Arabia Secret Help
on Nuclear Weapons." The New York Times
Key Disclaimers
- Unverified
Claims: Some information in original drafts regarding specific recent
events (Saudi-Pakistan formal defense pact, Israel strikes on Qatar) could
not be verified through credible sources
- Classified
Information: Exact military capabilities and intelligence cooperation
details are often classified
- Evolving
Situation: Regional dynamics and relationships continue to change
rapidly
No comments:
Post a Comment